Immunosuppression with mycophenolic acid: one size does not fit all.

نویسنده

  • William M Bennett
چکیده

Over the past decade, immunosuppression for renal transplantation has shifted from predominantly azathioprine-based regimens to those containing mycophenolic acid (MMF, CellCept) (1). In most centers, MMF is combined with cyclosporine or tacrolimus (calcineurin inhibitors) plus corticosteroid therapy. These combinations have led to unprecedented patient and graft survivals over the near term (1 to 3 yr) and low rates of acute rejection. The recommended MMF dose is standard for all patients at 1 g twice daily. Long-term survivals of patients and grafts are also improving but are suboptimal. Donor factors such as age, prolonged cold ischemia, and delayed graft function are associated with shortened graft half-life. The occurrence of acute rejection episodes remains a strong predictor of shortened allograft half-life and chronic allograft nephropathy. In this issue of JASN, Knoll et al. (2) present a retrospective study showing the rather obvious fact that there is a decreased time to first acute rejection if the recommended dose of MMF is reduced because of side effects. Furthermore, there is a quantitative relationship between the time the patient spends at less than the recommended dose and the risk for acute rejection. Although the study is flawed in design by its retrospective nature and its failure to examine important variables such as cytomegalovirus (CMV) status and the length of time the patient was on dialysis, this study does illustrate the difficulty clinicians have in using drugs that have no biologic end points for dose adjustment. The situation with MMF dosing is analogous to prescribing warfarin anticoagulation with no knowledge of INR but instead having to wait for bleeding or thrombosis before making dose adjustments. The consequences of long-term corticosteroid use and the nephrotoxic/metabolic side effects of calcineurin inhibitors are related to total drug exposure. For calcineurin inhibitors, we use pharmacokinetic parameters to allow individualization of therapy. With MMF, the current practice is that one size fits all. The data of Knoll et al. suggest that this is inadequate. It is difficult to ascribe cause and effect to the reduced MMF dose and acute rejection for several reasons. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus each have different pharmacokinetic interactions with mycophenolate mofetil, and they were used sequentially in the study. There is no adjustment for length of renal failure, which could influence bone marrow tolerance of MMF, particularly with second transplants. CMV infections, which can be associated with dose-limiting leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and acute rejection, were not examined in this analysis, nor were renal function, liver function, and decreased drug-protein binding, all factors that increase mycophenolic acid exposure (3). Mycophenolic acid is prescribed as a morpholinoethyl ester, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, CellCept). The ester linkage is rapidly cleaved to the active compound, mycophenolic acid. MMF blocks de novo purine biosynthesis by inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH), thus decreasing the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes (4,5). The pharmacokinetics of MMF are complex; some patients achieve a peak in 1 to 2 h and a second peak at 5 to 6 h due to enterohepatic circulation. In some patients, the second peak (Cmax) is as much as 50% of the total peak concentration. A maximum concentration of 10 g/ml is associated with side effects. There is little correlation with area under the concentration curve (AUC) and dose. The AUC in the first 12 h does correlate with propensity to reject if it is 30 g h/ml or toxicity if it is 60 g h/ml. The desired exposure is 35 to 60 g h/ml (6,7). Mycophenolic acid AUC is increased by renal dysfunction, which may be clinically relevant early after transplantation or during rejection episodes (8,9). When heart transplant patients who had rejection were compared with patients who did not reject, doses were the same but rejecters had low AUC and trough levels (10). Most strategies to reduce steroids or to eliminate long-term nephrotoxic effects of calcineurin inhibitors presume adequate patient exposure to mycophenolic acid. This was true in the prematurely stopped NIH steroid withdrawal trial, where an excess of rejection episodes was seen in the patients who had steroids withdrawn. In African-American subjects in that trial, the dose of mycophenolic acid was only 200 mg more than in white patients; however, the rejection rate with steroid withdrawal was 40% in African Americans and 16% in non-African Americans. If indeed African Americans have increased propensity to reject and thus require larger doses of mycophenolate, one interpretation consistent with the data could be that inadequate mycophenolate was given to African-American patients (11). This type of analysis begs the question as to whether there are pharmacogenetic or gender differences in mycophenolate metabolism. Limited studies comparing pharmacokinetics parameters between African-American and white renal transplant patients have shown few differences, suggesting that the differences in rejection rates between Correspondence to: Dr. William M. Bennett, Solid Organ and Cellular Transplantation, Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 1040 NW 22 Avenue, Suite 480, Portland, OR 97210-3025. Phone: 503-413-7349; Fax: 503-413-6563; E-mail [email protected]

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Why and How to Perform Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Mycophenolate Mofetil

The introduction of the immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate mofetil as a standard-dose drug has resulted in a reduced risk of rejection after renal transplantation and improved graft survival compared to azathioprine. The favorable balance between efficacy and safety has made mycophenolate mofetil a cornerstone immunosuppressive drug, and the vast majority of newly transplanted patients are n...

متن کامل

Does tacrolimus, in comparison with sirolimus, increase mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplant recipients?

Based on their study, “Increased mycophenolic acid exposure in stable kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus as compared with , Braun et al. concluded that mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure is greater in those on sirolimus: implication for pharmacokinetics ” tacrolimus treated patients than in those treated with sirolimus during maintenance immunosuppression after kidney transplant and sugge...

متن کامل

Does One Size Fit All? The Impact of Liquidity Requirements on Bank\'s Insolvency: Evidence from Iranian Listed Banks

According to the Basel III regulatory framework, uniform minimum liquidity requirements have been imposed on all types of banks. Using an agent-based model of a banking system, we investigate the effects of liquidity requirements on banks' insolvency under two policy experiments in one of which the minimum liquidity requirements are applied uniformly and in the other differentially across banks...

متن کامل

Prescription trends of immunosuppressive drugs in post-heart transplant recipients in Taiwan, 2000–2009

PURPOSE Significantly increasing heart transplantations have been performed in Taiwan in the past decades, but the trends of maintenance immunosuppression for heart transplant recipients have not been well known. In this study, we aimed to explore the trends of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy and common complications for heart transplant recipients. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed a...

متن کامل

Conversion from tacrolimus/mycophenolic acid to tacrolimus/leflunomide to treat cutaneous warts in a series of four pediatric renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND The challenge of immunosuppression in pediatric renal transplantation is to balance preventing rejection while avoiding infectious complications. A dermatological complication of immunosuppression is viral warts, which cause significant disfigurement and increase the risk of skin malignancy. METHODS We present three pediatric and adolescent renal allograft recipients with multiple,...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN

دوره 14 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003